General Feature Requests
PURPOSE
Please help us collect ideas for new features and general product enhancements.
Remember, if your idea is a small tweak or defaults change then please use either the Default Settings or Small Annoying Things forums.
What’s on your top ten list? Add a vote to any idea you also think is important!
HOW TO USE THE FORUM
- Each user has 20 votes for each forum
- Each idea can have no more than 3 votes by a single user
- If you enter an idea, it will cost you 1 vote – therefore try to make sure the idea doesn’t already exist
- The more precise and detailed a description you give, the more likely your idea will be considered
- When an idea is implemented (or declined), votes are returned to all the users that voted
- Users can change their votes at any time
- Admins can move, edit and delete ideas as they see fit to better meet the goals of the forum
- We will flag ideas that are getting our attention as “under review”. Because of limits on what we can say publicly, that is as far as we can go with commenting on a particular idea. If it is “under review” it simply means we’re studying it for possible implementation or gathering data, but there is no commitment to do it.
Remember, we do not release versions on “internet time”. Unlike the web sites this was designed for, our process of releasing functionality is much longer term. So there won’t be a constant churn of ideas being “closed out” by us and votes returned to you. For this tool to map to our process, we will be looking at the data during a short period of the year (3-6 months) and deciding what actions to take after that. Don’t expect to post an idea and a month later for us to respond in some fashion to it. The most likely scenario is that you’ll post an idea and if a lot of other people vote on it, we’ll eventually flag it as “under review” – but that could be 9 months later or longer.
Please treat this as an experiment in working with the community. Even if Uservoice is not the final home for this, we’ll do our best to export all the ideas to whatever future system might take its place. Your voice will persist.
Note: It’s important to realize that these lists are simply raising the quality of the feedback we get from the community. They are not a replacement for how we define the features for any given release. They are valuable input, but beta input, product strategy, focus, innovation and other factors are also important aspects we consider.
BUGS
Please report them at http://www.autodesk.com/3dsmax-DefectSubmission
AVAILABLE PUBLIC FORUMS
Default Settings
Please tell us which user defaults settings you change the most! Enter a description of the default or ini setting and then see how the community votes on it. Remember these are only the user preferences you can either set in the interface or ini files.
General Feature Requests
Please help us collect ideas for new features and general product enhancements. What’s on your top ten list? Add a vote to any idea you also think is important!
Small Annoying Things
This forum is about all the little annoying quirks and problems in 3ds Max that you might have gotten used to over the years but that really should be fixed.
Remember, keep these ideas to tweaks of the workflow rather than large, sweeping changes to the tools. Try to imagine how much effort a programmer has to go into in order to implement your suggestion. Anything requiring major UI changes or new UI dialogs will need to go in another forum.
SDK/Scripting Enhancements
This forum is about improvements to the SDK or Script-related.
-
multithreaded Pflow
Pflow needs to be multithreaded.
296 votes -
Support mr Proxies in Particle System
Proxies need to be available when using particle systems e.g. when creating forests, grass, rocks etc.
77 votes -
Integrate Naiad Fluid Simulation with 3ds Max ...
It will be nice to integrate Naiad inside 3ds Max which Autodesk owns now ...
Like Pixomondo Studios, they built their own Naiad graph interface right into 3ds Max ...
Thanx ..
23 votes -
A new Force spacewarp (like sphere gizmo) to delete Force informations
A new Force spacewarp (like sphere gizmo) to delete Force informations like Turbulence in an specific area like in FumeFX (Void Src). It could be very useful with Pflow and some VFX animations.
18 votes -
Wind spacewarp should have controls like lights' - falloff, cone, etc. Much more control.
The current spacewarps are old and unwieldy. It would be great to have the same level of control that a light has, for falloff, cone/omni/directional, separate falloff for turbulence, etc. The ultimate dream would be assembling vector fields from helpers - imagine a set of helpers, bound them to a spacewarp node and it gives the combined field - directional pushes, spline fields, etc.
13 votes -
Shape Output List Subop
Shape Output List sub operator in Box3 that has two inputs - Geometry and Integer. You pipe in a Geometry list and an index. The index references which geometry in the list that particle will use as a shape.
8 votes -
Creat A new View in Particle System
" Creat a new view in PF " just the same thing in " Creat a new view in Material Editor "
3 votes -
More control over the forces
Different types of attenuation. Visual feedback from viewports. For example Vortex and Motor are difficult to control.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?